Recently on an Internet forum some one from the Bay Area in California made a derogatory comment against the Bush Administration, although no one was too surprised over it. One commenter stated after hearing this;

"Hayward CA, you mean the liberal bay area. Everyone there hates Bush, it is mandatory to live there and get along with others. In fact you "cannot" support Bush where you are, yes, I understand that, as I am from LA.”

But we need to support the team, not divide. And to that point I suppose placing blame on the President is silly, because he merely riding on top of a raft of sewage in the blob of bureaucracy. I think the US Presidency seems to be me more of a PR power play than having the strength to really change much.

And we all watched the Democrats put up an opposition alternative? Kerry was not viable, in the pockets of lobbyists, we all studied his voting record and Edwards was a class action lawyer? So if that is the option that the Dems put up? Well, one does not necessarily wish to turn the country over to lawyers do they?

In the end, I support my President, I do not support my government having more of my tax money come the 17th, as I am already paying them too much and getting too little for it. I am tax adverse and do not trust the government not to waste my money. Maybe we might all consider this before bagging on the highest office of the land or the man or woman who sits in that chair in the oval office. Think on this in 2006.